St. Joseph’s College of Commerce M.I.B. 2013 III sem Ethics For Business Decisions Question Paper PDF Download

1
ST. JOSEPH’S COLLEGE OF COMMERCE (AUTONOMOUS)
END SEMESTER EXAMINATION – OCTOBER 2013
M.I.B. – III SEMESTER
ETHICS FOR BUSINESS DECISIONS
Time: 3 hrs Max. Marks:100
Section – A
I) Answer any SEVEN questions. (out of 10) (7×5=35)
1. Explain the significance of the RTI Act.
2. Why is surrogate advertising unethical?
3. What is whistle blowing? What is its role in corporate ethical behaviour?
4. What is the Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006?
5. Discuss the basic objectives of SEBI.
6. What is ASCI? What are its codes?
7. Explain Green Marketing and Green Washing?
8. Discuss CSR and its role in business ethics.
9. Briefly explain the six stage model of Kohlberg.
10. Explain Kantianism and its relevance to business organisations.
Section – B
II. Answer any THREE questions. (out of 5) (3×15=45)
11. Discuss the major HR related ethical issues in the Indian Context.
12. Explain the areas in marketing ethics (the 4 Ps) with suitable examples.
13. What is the role of board of directors in ensuring ethical business.
14. Discuss the important laws passed in India for protecting consumers.
15. Discuss the different obligations of a company to ensure corporate
governance.
Section –C
III) Case Study – compulsory question. (1×20=20)
Ethics of Ads targeting Children
Over the years, there have been several controversies surrounding ads for children.
Though there are strict guidelines and laws against advertising many products
targeted at children in USA and UK, in India, there are no such regulations.
Every advertisement has a target audience. The question is whether there should be
stricter regulations for advertising that focus on more vulnerable sections, especially
children. Is it alright to show smart looking middle class mothers, usually played by
popular actresses or models, serving their children a meal of instant noodles or
cereals fortified with small quantities of vitamins?
A WHO report mentions that there has been intense lobbying by the private sector
against proposals restricting ads of food products for children. This sector of
2
marketing has been growing in tandem with globalisation and the fastest growth has
been registered in China and India.
Questions:
1. Why do marketers target children?
2. What are the pros and cons of this strategy?

St. Joseph’s College of Commerce M.Com. 2013 III Sem Ethics For Business Decisions Question Paper PDF Download

1
ST. JOSEPH’S COLLEGE OF COMMERCE (AUTONOMOUS)
END SEMESTER EXAMINATION – OCTOBER 2013
M.COM – III SEMESTER
ETHICS FOR BUSINESS DECISIONS
Duration: 3 hours Max. Marks: 100
SECTION – A
I) Answer SEVEN questions out of Ten. ( 7×5 = 35)
1. What is business ethics? Is it the same as “Religion, Law, Cultural traits, Feelings, a
branch of Science a collection of values?” Discuss.
2. Discuss the basis of moral rights according to Immanuel Kant? State the criticisms
against Kantian view.
3. “The six pillars of character taken together act as a multi level filter through which
ethical decisions can be processed, and they believe, these can dramatically improve
the ethical quality of our decisions, and thus our character and lives.” Comment.
4. Explain the concept “marketing ethics”? Discuss the areas where changes are
required to happen to acquire moral development and enhancement of marketing
ethics in the context of Indian environment.
5. Write a note on the emerging challenges in the functional areas of HRM.
6. Discuss ethical issues involved with creative accounting?
7. Identify the various elements responsible for the commission of bank frauds. What
are the measures suggested against bank frauds?
8. “Preservation of a healthy environment is everybody’s concern” What role is
expected of stakeholders to play in ensuring environmental preservation?
9. Write an account of environmental audit.
10. Elucidate the key contributions of good corporate governance to a corporation.
SECTION – B
II) Answer any THREE questions out of Five. (3 x 15 = 45)
11. Discuss the “concept of ethical dilemma.” What is the reason behind the ethical
dilemma that takes place under an organizational set up? How do ethical dilemmas
in business affect the stakeholders? How can a business organization resolve ethical
dilemmas?
2
12. What are the models that guide managers and executives in making Ethical
decisions? Discuss a suitable framework for ethical decision making. What are the
most important issues to be tackled in the process?
13. “In a general sense, marketers must accept overall responsibility for the
consequences of their actions.” Identify some universal ethical guidelines on which
marketers action should be based. Elaborate on ethical issues concerned with four
Ps of marketing with suitable examples.
14. To achieve fairness, HR executives, apart from having an ethical conscience, follow a
well-laid system of procedures that address the range of human resource issues in
the pursuit of organizational justice. Discuss the various ethical issues that arise out
of the employer-employee relationship.
15. Explain what constitutes good corporate governance from the context of different
stakeholders.
SECTION – C
III) Compulsory Case study (1 x 20 = 20)
Jerome Kerviel: Rogue Trader or Misguided Employee
Socie’te’ Ge’ne’rale: is a French Bank, which is globally recognized. The French
company Socie’te’ Ge’ne’rale (ScoGen) was founded on May 4, 1864. The bank serves
19.2 million individual customers in 76 countries. It employs 103,000 workers from 114
different nationalities. SocGen operates in three major businesses: (i). retail banking &
financial services, (ii). global investment management & services and (iii). corporate &
investment banking. The core values of the company were professionalism, team spirit
and innovation. In 2006, SocGen ranked 67 on Fortune’s 2006 Global 500.
The turmoil in 2006 revolved around the collapsing housing market and a mortgage
industry that witnessed loan defaults in record numbers. Several banks were engaged
in purchasing high-risk mortgage loans. It constrained SocGen’s financial status.
SocGen saw its stock price cut almost in half throughout the year, but it was not the
only potential pitfall for this once robust company. It was the actions of one rogue
trader, Jerome Kerviel, that could have signaled the ultimate downfall of SocGen.
On January 24, 2008, SocGen announced to the world that it discovered a $7.14 billion
trading fraud caused by a single trader Kerviel. Additionally, a nearly $3 billion loss
was posted due to loss in investments in the U.S. subprime mortgage industry. SocGen
halted its shares to avoid complete market collapse on the price of the stock. Jerome
Kerviel, 31 year old, unmarried, did not profit from his scheme. He had been an
employee of SocGen since 2000. He was working in the futures trading desk of the
bank. Kerviel saw his trading profits increase throughout 2007. By the end of the year
3
he needed to mask his significant gains, so he created fictional losing positions to erode
his gains. By mid-January, Kerviel had lost over $3 billion. He was hedging more than
73.3 billion, an amount far in excess of trading limits created by SocGen for a single
trader. This amount even exceeded SocGen’s overall market cap of $52.6 billion.
Despite five levels of increased security to prevent traders from assuming positions
greater than a predetermined amount, and a group compliance division in charge of
monitoring trader activity, Kerviel was able to bypass internal controls for over two
years.
Kerviel’s motive was not to steal from the bank, but to have his significant trading gains
catapult his career and to cash in on a significant bonus given to traders who exhibit the
type of profitability he created for the company. Red flags were triggered, but e-mails to
his superiors on his trading activity were ignored due to his overall profitability for the
company. Kerviel admitted his wrong doing, but stated that SocGen was partially
responsible for not monitoring his activities correctly and rewarded his behavior with a
proposed bonus of $440, 000. Kerviel stated that his actions were similar to those of
other traders; he was just being labeled as the scapegoat in this investigation.
Once the fraud was detected in mid-January, 2008, SocGen immediately reported it to
France’s central Bank, Bank of France. After Kerviel admitted his guilt, his employment
was terminated along with that of his supervisors. CEO David Bouton submitted a
formal resignation, along with second-in-command, Phillipe Citerne; however, both
were rejected by the Board of Directors. employees of the company staged
demonstrations where they showed their support for Bouton.
The bank has stated that since the activity was brought to light, there was tightening on
the internal controls, so that actions such as Kerviel’s are no longer possible for a trader.
On January 25, 2008, SocGen took out a full page news paper article apologizing to its
customers for the scandal.
Kerviel was able to evade detection because of his experience in monitoring the traders
in his early years at SocGen. Falsifying bank records and compute fraud were part of
the intricate scheme that Kerviel created. Kerviel knew when he would be monitored by
the bank and avoided any activity during those periods. He created a fictitious
company and falsified trading records to keep his activity under wraps. Kerviel also
used other employee’s computer access codes and falsified trading documents.
Questions:
1. Is Kerviel the only one who is guilty in this case with regard to his actions? Explain.
2. Should other individuals and the bank be legally held responsible and liable for
Kerviel’s actions? Why or Why not? Explain.
3. Describe what you believe to have been Kerviel’s personal and professional ethics?
(Use the terms that you have studied in module 1).

St. Joseph’s College of Commerce M.Com. 2014 III Sem Ethics For Business Decisions Question Paper PDF Download

  1. JOSEPH’S COLLEGE OF COMMERCE (AUTONOMOUS)

End Semester Examinations – SEPT /OCT. 2014

MIB – III semester

ETHICS FOR BUSINESS DECISIONS 

Duration: 3 Hrs                                                                                           Max. Marks: 100

Section – A

 

  1. I) Answer any SEVEN Each carries 5 marks.                       (7 x 5 = 35)

 

  1. Discuss the ethical Code of Conduct expected from managers while performing their duties. Why is it mandatory for business act ethically?
  2. Briefly discuss the relevance of “Prisoner’s dilemma argument” and its implications in business.
  3. What precautionary tests are advised to be taken by a manager before making effective decisions?
  4. Comment on the general ethical issues encountered by marketing managers with suitable examples.
  5. What are the Ethical issues associated with pricing which demands regulations in pricing?
  6. Compare and contrast the three main kinds of arguments (Utilitarian, Rights and Justice) against racial and sexual job discrimination.
  7. What are the expected standards of ethical behaviour code, the financial management personnel should maintain while discharging their duties? What are the circumstances under which financial management indulge in fraudulent behaviour?
  8. Who is an Insider? What is meant by Insider Trading? Give a few examples of “unpublished price sensitive information.”
  9. In your judgment, what kinds of ethical guidelines should be recommended for attaining sustainable development of the environment?
  10. Enumerate the steps taken by SEBI for strengthening corporate governance in India.

Section – B

  1. II) Answer any THREE Each carries 15 marks.                        (3 x 15   = 45)

 

  1. Describe various dimensions of the concepts “Individualism and Collectivism” and its implications under business organizational environment.
  2. Critically evaluate producer’s duties to the consumer. In your judgment, which theory is more adequate? Explain.
  3. Elucidate the ethical issues companies make in relation with human resource management.
  4. Discuss the structure and functioning of Banking Ombudsman Scheme 2006. What are the benefits of the Banking Ombudsman Scheme.
  5. In view of the contractual agreement that every employee makes to be loyal to the employer, do you think that whistle blowing is ever morally justified? What is “Whistle Blower Protection” and how is it dealt with under India’s situation. Explain your answer with proper examples.

 

Section – C

 

III)    Compulsory Case study.                                                                               (1 x 20 = 20)

 

  1. Off your face on face book?

 

You are the personnel manager of AllCure Pharmaceuticals. It’s a busy time and the guys in the product approval department have called you up because they desperately need to hire a new team member to assist them with clinical tests of what could become the next block buster drug for the company. You get to work and within a week have actually managed to get three well qualified applicants for the job. The interviews went well and there are two really good applicants. Bothe are women, recent college graduates,  and you find it hard to decide among them.

The clinical trials that the new hire will work on are very important. They require a very reliable, meticulous work attitude, but also good social skills to manage the different relations between the  clinics, the approving authorities, and various departments in the company. A colleague suggests you check the two finalists out on Myspace, Facebook, or any other social networking site. Later at home you go on Facebook, and yes, one of them is there! Surfing through the posts and her photos you see a very sociable, obviously well travelled individual. The other candidate is a bit more difficult to locate. This is too bad, as she already has some work experience and is slightly better candidate of the two. Her details are available only to her friends, but browsing through her list of some 400 friends, you find that one of your current interns is actually on her list. Next morning you ask your intern, who it turns out briefly met this second candidate on a course they took  together at college years ago, whether you could have a look at the Facebook page of the second candidate. Doing so you make some interesting discoveries: not only do you find a number of photos of her at parties with precious few clothes on, but there are even two pictures where she enjoys what undoubtedly looks like a line of cocaine.

You thank your intern for her help and walk back to your office wondering what to do. You certainly do not want to hire someone who has this kind of reputation or where patients in trials or people from approving bodies say: “Heard about Dr. X.? You really have to see these pictures.”

 

Questions:

 

  1. What are the main ethical issues in this case?
  2. What are the main ethical arguments for and against the use of social network sites for potential employers in this situation?
  3. How would you finally decide as the personnel manager in this situation?

 

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

 

 

End Semester Examinations – OCTOBER 2014

MIB – III semester

Ethics for Business Decisions   [Answer Key]

  1. Managers must observe the following ethical values while performing their duties:

Impartiality, Responsiveness to public interest, Accountability, Honesty, Transparency, Integrity. The reasons for an organization to be ethical include: To protect its own interest,

To protect the interests of the business community as a whole so that the public will have trust in it, To keep its commitment to society to act ethically, To meet stakeholder expectations, To prevent harm to the general public, To build trust with key stakeholder groups, To protect themselves from abuse from unethical employees and competitors, To protect their own reputations, To protect their own employees, and To create an environment in which workers can act in ways consistent with their values.

2.

  Prisoner B Cooperates with prisoner A

 

Prisoner B does not Cooperates with prisoner A

 

Prisoner A cooperates with prisoner B

 

A gets 1 year

B gets 1 year

 

A gets 3 years

B goes free

 

Prisoner A  does not cooperates with prisoner B

 

A goes free

B gets 3 years

 

A gets 2 year

B gets 2 year

 

In real life individuals have to have an ongoing relationship with each other. If one takes advantage of the other in one interaction, the victim can retaliate by doing the same in the next interaction. This threat of future retaliation makes it more rational for the parties in a series of repeated exchanges to cooperate than to take advantage of the other.  Implications in business: Business interactions with employees, customers , suppliers and creditors are repetitive and on going. If business tries to take advantage of employees, customers , suppliers and creditors through unethical behavior today, the latter will find a way to retaliate.

  1. Relevant Information Test, Involvement Test, Consequentialist Test, Ethical Principles Test, Fairness Test, Universality Test.
  2. 1. Shady and aggressive tactics: Harms consumers. E.g., preserving fish, vegetables. 2. Unfair practices. 3. Out right deception and fraud. 4. Invasion of privacy issues. 5. Price fixing:

An agreement among firms to set their prices at artificially high levels (happens under oligopoly market). 6. Manipulation of supply. 7. Exclusive dealing arrangements. 8. Tying arrangements. 9. Retail price maintenance agreements. 10 Price discrimination.

 

  1. 1. Deceptive pricing: A. Bait and Switch pricing, B. Inflated Price. 2. Unfair Pricing:Uses pricing practices to drive competitors out of business. A. Predatory Pricing: 3.  Price Discrimination, 4.  price Fixing; It is an agreement among firms in an industry to set prices at certain levels. The Sherman Act prohibits it because such actions restrict price competition. Two types of price fixing are: A. Horizontal price Fixing: B.  Vertical Price Fixing.
  2. Utility: discrimination leads to inefficient use of human resources. Rights: discrimination violates basic human rights. Justice: discrimination results in unjust distributions of benefits and burdens.
  3. Ethical behaviour code: 1. Competence in Performing their professional duties, 2. Refrain from disclosing confidential information, 3. Integrity, 4. Objectivity. Circumstances: Unjustifiably aggressive financial Targets, Domination by person or group without controls, Aggressive accounting practice to keep stock prices high, Pressure to reduce tax liabilities, Major performance related compensation, Non-Financial personnel involved in accounting matters.
  4. Insider: Person who is/was connected with the company or is deemed to have been connected with the company and is reasonably expected to have access, by virtue of such connection, to unpublished price sensitive information in respect of securities of the company, or who has received or has had access to such unpublished price sensitive information. Insider trading: Trading of a corporation`s stock or other securities (e.g. bonds or stock options) by individuals with potential access to non-public information about the company. Unpublished price sensitive information: i. Financial results of the company, ii. Intended declaration of dividends, iii. Issue of shares by way of public rights, bonus, etc,  iv. Any major expansion plans or execution of new projects,  v. Amalgamation, mergers and takeovers, vi. Disposal of the whole/ substantial of the undertaking.
  5. i. Harvest rates should not exceed the reproduction rates, ii.The wastages have to be recycled, iii. Environmental governance should be a commitment to all organizations, iv. Too much consumerism has to be controlled by persuasion and ethical education, v. Efforts should be made to promote bio-diversity, vi. There should be the promotion of non-consumption values such as aesthetic , cultural , tourist and future.
  6. i. Strengthening of disclosure norms for Initial Public Offers, ii. Providing of information in director’s report for utilization of funds and variation between projected and actual use of funds, iii. Declaration of quarterly results, iv. Mandatory appointment of compliance officer for monitoring the share transfer process and ensuring compliance with various rules and regulations,  v.Timely disclosure of price sensitive information.
  7. Individualism is defined as an assessment of the emotional independence and autonomy of the person. It relates to an individual’s self-image or self-esteem. The foundation of individualism lies in one’s moral right to pursue one’s own happiness,initiative, and self-responsibility, personal sense of accomplishment.

Collectivism: Means greater emphasis on the views, needs, and goals of the in-group (A group whose norms, goals, and values shape the behavior / attitude of its members). Great readiness to cooperate with in-group members. Collectivism stresses human interdependence, focus on community and society, and seek to give priority to group goals over individual goals.

Individualism and collectivism: Individualism allows employees to directly engage corporate management and negotiate wages, salaries and benefits. Collectivism: Under the collectivism concept, individuals choose to benefit from the collective bargaining power of a union.

Horizontal Individualism: I’d rather depend on myself than others. Vertical Individualism: Competition is the law of nature. Horizontal Collectivism: The well-being of my coworkers is important to me. Vertical Collectivism: It is my duty to take care of my family, even when I have to sacrifice what I want.

 

  1. 1. Contract View of Business Firms Duty to Customers: Relationship between a business firm and its customers is essentially a contractual relationship. When a consumer buys a product, the consumer voluntarily enters into a sales contract with the firm. Contractual theory of business firms’ duties to consumers claims that a business has four main moral duties: Basic duty: i. complying with the terms of sales contract, Secondary duties: ii. Disclosing the nature of the product, iii. Avoiding misrepresentation, and vi. Avoiding the use of duress and undue influence.  2. The Due care Theory: Manufacturer has a duty to exercise due care to prevent others from being injured. Due care must enter into: The design of the product, The choice of reliable materials for the constructing the product, The manufacturing process involved in putting the product together, The quality control used to test and monitor production, The warnings, Labels, instructions attached to the product. 3. The Social Cost View of the Manufacturer’s Duties: A legal doctrine that holds that manufacturers must bear the cost of injuries resulting from product s regardless of fault.
  2. 1. Discrimination issues: Age, Gender, Race, Religion, Disabilities, Weight, Attractiveness
  3. Suppression of Democratization in the Work Place: Suppression of democratic rights of employees, Suppression of employees rights of representation of employees in bodies that would promote their collective interests, Tempting and bribing pliable union leaders, Union busting, Strike breaking. 3. Privacy issues : protecting a person’s private life from intrusive and unwarranted action by others (employers), Work place surveillance on viewing through CCTVs, tapping phones, reading computer files, Some contentious areas are: drug testing, aids testing, so on. 4. Recruitment and selection: Information about past employer, Seeking financial status, caste and family matters, Unwanted personal details. 5. Performance tracking, 6. Privacy issues of computerized employee records, 7. Electronic surveillance, 8. Safety and health, 9. Performance appraisals
  4. RBI facilitated the formulation of Fair Practices Code for Lenders and Codes of Conduct. RBI prescribed: proper disclosures by banks, simplified procedures to facilitate expeditious and hassle free settlement of claims of deceased depositors, Customers’ Service Committee of the Board to bring about ongoing improvement in the quality of customer service rendered, hassle free settlement of claims of deceased depositors. RBI facilitated the formulation of Banking Code and Standards Board of India, to place all the awards passed by the Banking Ombudsman before the Customer Service Committee. Legal Basis: Notified in terms of Sec 35A of Banking Regulation Act 1949. Purpose of the Scheme: Expeditious and inexpensive redressal of customer complaints, Deficiency in banking services, deficiency in sanctioning of loans and advances, Other specified matters. Vision: To provide an inexpensive, transparent and credible mechanism ensuring fair treatment of the common person utilizing Banking services

Goals: To ensure customer facilitation and protection through redressal of grievances of users of banking services in an inexpensive, expeditious, fair, reasonable and hassle free manner that will provide impetus for improved customer service on a continuous basis, Provide feedback for framing appropriate and timely guidelines, Enhance awareness of the scheme itself

Benefits: Prompt and impartial resolution of complaints, No cost to the customer, Assessment based on overall fairness, good business practices, accepted banking law and practice.

  1. A whistleblower is a person who exposes misconduct, alleged dishonest or illegal activity occurring in an organization. The ethics of whistle blowing: 1. From the people’s point of view: i. need for truth, ii. The trust factor, iii. Better relation between the general public and  company.    2. From the company’s point of view: i. Accuses whistle blowers of breaching the confidentiality agreement, ii. view whistle blowing as an act towards money and fame.
  2. From the whistle blower’s point of view: Caught up between integrity, commitment and truth. Consequences of blowing the “whistle” is pretty immense and heavy. “Whistleblower protection”refers to laws and regulation that offers protection who exposes wrongdoing and dishonest activities.  The wrongdoing may take the form of fraud, corruption or mismanagement. Also, it offers punishment against false or frivolous complaints.  Indian situation: It was passed by the Lok Sabha on 27th December, 2011 and by Rajya Sabha  on  21st February, 2014 and is still waiting president’s assent.

 

 

 

St. Joseph’s College of Commerce M.Com. 2014 III Sem Ethics For Business Decisions Question Paper PDF Download

  1. JOSEPH’S COLLEGE OF COMMERCE (AUTONOMOUS)

END SEMESTER EXAMINATION – OCTOBER 2014

M COM – III SEMESTER

  ETHICS FOR BUSINESS DECISIONS

Duration: 3Hrs.                                                                                          Max. Marks: 100

Section – A

  1. Answer any SEVEN questions. Each carries 5 marks.                          (7×5=35)
  2. What is insider trading? What is unethical about it? Give 2 examples.
  3. Explain the significance of the RTI Act. Give 2 examples.
  4. Why is surrogate advertising unethical? Explain with examples.
  5. What is whistle blowing? What is its role in corporate ethical behaviour?
  6. Outline the concept of distributive justice and compensatory justice.
  7. Discuss the basic objectives of SEBI.
  8. Explain two cases of unethical practices in HRM in Indian context.
  9. Explain Green Production and Green Washing.
  10. Discuss CSR and its role in business ethics.
  11. Briefly explain Kantianism and its relevance to business organisations.

Section – B

  1. Answer any THREE questions. Each carries 15 marks.                      (3×15=45)
  2. Discuss the six stage model of Kohlberg. In which stage will a whistle blower be, and why?
  3. Explain the areas in marketing ethics (the 4 Ps) with suitable examples.
  4. What is the role of Board of Directors in ensuring ethical business?
  5. Discuss consumerism and its role in society. List out five laws passed in India in the context of consumerism.
  6. Discuss the different possibilities of bank frauds in India with examples.

 

 Section –C

 

  • Case Study – Compulsory                                                              (20 marks)
  1. Marketers targeting Children – the ethical aspects

During the last ten years, there have been several controversies surrounding marketers and advertisers targeting children.  Though there are strict guidelines and laws against advertising many products targeted at children in USA and UK, in India, there are no such regulations. In USA, for example, there are strict restrictions on promoting fast-food for children, in view of the social concerns of obesity- related health problems. President Obama has introduced even a ‘Sin Tax’ to curtail fast-food sales and consumption especially by children.

Every advertisement has a target audience. The question is whether there should be stricter regulations for advertising that focus on more vulnerable sections, especially children. Is it alright to show smart looking middle class mothers, usually played by popular actresses or models, serving their children a meal of instant noodles or cereals fortified with small quantities of vitamins? Is it ethical for marketers to persuade children to eat Burger or French-fries instead of the traditional cereal food?

A WHO report mentions that there has been intense lobbying by the private sector against proposals restricting ads of food products for children. Everything from chocolates to consumer durables and even cars are advertised targeting children, mainly because of their pestering power to influence the buying decisions of their parents. This sector of marketing has been growing in tandem with globalisation and the fastest growth has been registered in China and India, in spite of the fact that many people consider it as unethical marketing practices.

 

Questions – (explain with examples)

  1. Why do marketers target children? Explain with Indian examples. (10 marks)
  2. What are the pros and cons of this strategy? (10 marks)

 

St. Joseph’s College of Commerce 2015 Ethics For Business Decisions Question Paper PDF Download

ST. JOSEPH’S COLLEGE OF COMMERCE (AUTONOMOUS)
END SEMESTER EXAMINATION –SEPT/OCT.2015
M.I.B. – III SEMESTER
P2 11 306: ETHICS FOR BUSINESS DECISIONS
Duration: 3 Hours                                                                                         Max. Marks: 100
SECTION – A
I. Answer any SEVEN questions.  Each carries 5 marks.                             (7 x 5 = 35)
  1. What does ‘code of ethics’ specify?
  2. What are the assumptions governing individualism and collectivism?
  3. Discuss the concept of ‘The Due Care Theory’ in protecting the interests of consumers in the market place.
  4. What is meant by deceptive advertisement? What are the elements that make advertisement deceptive?
  5. What are the different types of “Whistle blowing”? Discuss the arguments for and against whistle blowing?
  6. How will you explain discrimination at work places? What are the arguments against discrimination?
  7. What are the ethical issues involved in Insider Trading?
  8. What is the role of financial statement in upholding ethical standards?
  9. What is global warming? What causes global warming?
  10. Briefly state “Stewardship Theory” under corporate governance.
SECTION – B
II. Answer any THREE questions.  Each carries 15 marks.                               (3×15=45)
  11. “Kohlberg’s views on moral development show that the more morally mature  a person becomes, the more likely it is that the person will obey the moral norms of his or her society.”  Discuss the statement.
  12. Describe ethical issues that arise in relationship with an organization’s marketing activities.
  13. Highlight ethical issues relating to Human Resource Management in work places.  Discuss the role of HRM in creating an ethical organization?
  14. Define the main forms of pollution and resource depletion and identify the major problems associated with each of them.
  15. What is meant by ‘churning’? What are its elements?
SECTION – C
III. Case Study                                                                                                            (1×20=20)
  16. No such thing as a free drink?

A good friend of yours, who studies at the same university, has been complaining for some time to you that he never has any money. He decides that he needs to go out and find a job, and after searching for a while is offered a job as a bartender in the student bar at your university. He gladly accepts and begins working three nights a week. You too are pleased, not only because it means that your friend will have more money, but also because the fact is that you often go to the student bar already and so will continue to see him quite frequently despite him having the new job.

The extra money is indeed much welcomed by your friend (especially as he has less time to spend it now too), and initially he seems to enjoy the work. You are also rather pleased with developments since you notice that whenever you go up to the bar, your friend always serves you first regardless of how many people are waiting. After a time though, it becomes apparent that your friend is enjoying the job rather less. Whenever you see him, he always seems to have a new story of mistreatment at the hands of the bar manager, such as getting the worst shifts, being repeatedly chosen to do the least popular jobs, and being reprimanded for minor blunders that go uncensored for the rest of the staff. This goes on for a short while and then one day, when you are in the bar having a drink with some of your other friends, your friend the bartender does something that you are not quite sure how to react to. When you go up to pay for a round of four beers for you and your other friends, he discretely only charges you for one. Whilst you are slightly uncomfortable with this, you certainly don’t want to get your friend into any kind of trouble by mentioning it. And when you tell your friends about it, they of course think it is very funny and congratulate you for the cheap round of drinks! In fact, when the next one of your friends goes up to pay for some drinks, he turns around and asks you to take his money, so that you can do the same trick for him. Although you tell him to get his own drinks, your friend the bartender continues to undercharge you whenever it is your turn to go to the bar. In fact this goes on for a number of visits, until you resolve to at least say something to him when no one else behind the bar is listening. However, when you do end up raising the subject he just laughs it off and says, ‘Yeah, it’s great isn’t it? They’ll never notice and you get a cheap night out. Besides, it’s only what this place deserves after the way I’ve been treated.’

Questions:

a. Who is wrong in this situation-your friend for undercharging you, you for accepting it, both of you, or neither of you?

b.  Confronted by this situation, how would you handle it? Do nothing or ask your friend to stop undercharging you? If you take the latter option, what would you do if he refused?

c.  To what extent do you think that being deliberately undercharged is different from other forms of preferential treatment, such as serving you in front of other waiting customers?

d. Does the fact that your friend feels aggrieved at the treatment he receives from his boss condone his behaviour at all? Does it help to explain either his or your actions?

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&

 

 

 

St. Joseph’s College of Commerce 2015 Ethics For Business Decisions Question Paper PDF Download

ST. JOSEPH’S COLLEGE OF COMMERCE (AUTONOMOUS)
END SEMESTER EXAMINATION – SEPT/OCT.2015
M.COM – III SEMESTER
 P111303:ETHICS FOR BUSINESS DECISIONS
Duration: 3 Hours                                                                                              Max. Marks: 100
SECTION – A
I. Answer any SEVEN questions.  Each carries 5 marks.                                    (7×5=35)
  1. Explain ‘Code of Ethics’ and discuss the benefit of Managing Ethics

at Work Place.

  2. What is CSR?  Discuss the role of different stake holders.
  3. What are the roles and functions of an ethical manager?
  4. Examine what is meant by ethical dilemma.
  5. Write a brief note on straw men approach in ethics.
  6. Explain stereotyping.
  7. Write a short note on Accounting Shenanigans
  8. Elaborate descriptive ethics and normative ethics.
  9. Explain the merits and limitations of legal accounting.
  10. Write a note on the relevance of ethics in marketing.
SECTION – B
II. Answer any THREE questions.  Each carries 15 marks.                                (3×15=45)
  11. Why is ethics important for a Corporate? What are the causes of unethical behavior in workplaces?
  12. Write short notes on any two of the following.

a)      “good business is good to do business with”

b)     the six test of ethical action.

c)      Ethical hiring and equality of opportunity.

  13. Bright Baby’s Bright Idea Bartok Manufacturing produces a line of infant toys under the “Bright Baby” brand label. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) recently issued a recall order for the Bright Baby car seat gym, a very popular product. According to the CPSC, the gym contains small parts that present a choking hazard. The CEO of Bartok Manufacturing, Bill Bartok, called an executive meeting to determine the firm’s strategy in response to the recall. Mike Henderson, Bartok’s CFO, stated that the recall could cost as much as $1 million in lost revenue from the Bright Baby line. Noting that there had been no deaths or injuries from the product, just the potential for injury, Mike proposed that the remaining inventory of car seat gyms be sold in Mexico, where there are no rules such as the CPSC’s. Sue Tyler, the marketing director for Bartok, recommended that the product be repackaged and sold in Mexico under a different brand name so that the Bright Baby name would not be associated with the product. Bill, though a bit leery of the plan, agreed to go along with it to avoid the monetary losses. What would you have recommended to the CEO?

 

 

 

  14. “Corporate cannot ignore the concerns of environment and its ecology.” In the light of this statement describe the obligations of the corporate towards environment and society

 

  15. Give in details various ethical compliance programs an organization can initiate.
SECTION – C
III. Case Study                                                                                                              (1×20=20)
  16. Britt Smith was recently hired by a large architecture and engineering firm as an assistant account manager in the government contracts division. The firm specializes in building hospitals, schools and other large-scale projects. Britt is excited to learn that she will be part of the marketing team that presents the firm’s proposals to the clients. In this case the clients are primarily federal and state governmental agencies. The presentations are elaborate, often costing $50,000 or more to prepare. But the projects can be worth millions to the firm, so the investment is worth it. The firm has a solid record for building quality projects, on time. And the majority of the time within budget. The firm also has an impressive track record, being awarded government contracts an incredible 85 percent of the time. No other firm in the industry comes close to this record.

The first project Britt is assigned to is an enormous project to design a new military hospital complex. The team leader, Brian Jenkins, has stressed how crucial it is for the firm to land this contract. He hints that if the team is successful the members will be well compensated. In fact, Britt heard that the members of the winning team for the last contract this size each received a $10,000 bonus.

Not long after the project commences, Brian invites Britt to have lunch so they can get to know each other better. During lunch, a man approaches Brian and asks if he has received the information. The man says that he knows that with this information the firm is a sure winner. He also reminds Brian that he is due a bonus for getting such crucial information. Brian comes back and explains that the man was George Miller who was the former head of the division awarding the hospital contract. George had been helping Brian by talking to the decision team and getting information that was relevant to the bid. Brian explained that the information George gathered about the internal discussions among the buying team would be what made their proposal a clear winner. This was obviously good news for the team since a winning bid meant bonuseswere almost assured.

After lunch Britt looked at the ethics manual which she had received just a week back on her joining. Lobbying without disclosure and paying for insider information were clearly discussed as unethical practices. Yet Brian seemed perfectly comfortable discussing George’s role with Britt.

Britt decides she should check with another team member about the use of insider information, so she asks Sue Garcia. Sue tells Britt that this kind of thing happens all the time. She jokes that most of the people in the division had at one time or another worked for the government. They all still knew people in the various agencies. As far as Sue was concerned, friends will talk and that is not illegal, so there was no problem. It was a win—win situation: the government got their building, the firm got their funding, and the employees got their bonuses.

Britt realizes that with her overdue credit card bill and her needed car repairs, the bonus money would really help out. Besides she is the most junior member of the team. If all the others are comfortable with this practice, why should she be concerned? After, all it Is just friends talking, Isn’t it?

 

Questions:

 

a. Analyze Britt’s dilemma. Should she go to the company’s ethics officer and report what she knows about the use of insider information?

b. As the most Junior member of the team, do you feel that Britt has less of an ethical duty to report the actions of the team than more senior members of the team do? Why or why not?

c. If you were the ethics officer for this firm would you address the belief among employees that it is acceptable to discuss a pending proposal with members of the decision team? If so, how? If you would not discuss this belief, why not?

 

&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
Answer Schem – Ethics for Business decisions

SECTION A: 4 MARKS QUESTIONS CARRIES MAXIMUM 3.5 MARKS

 

3.5 MARKS FOR EXCELLENT, 3 MARKS FOR VERY GOOD, 2.5-GOOD, 2 FOR AVG. 1-MARK FOR JUSTIFY THE EFFORT.

  1. A code of ethics specifies the ethical rules of operation. It’s the `thou shalt nots. codes should not be developed out of the Human Resource or Legal departments alone, as is too often done. Codes are insufficient if intended only to ensure that policies are legal. All staff must see the ethics program being driven by top management.  codes of ethics and codes of conduct may be the same in some organizations, depending on the organization’s culture and operations and on the ultimate level of specificity in the code(s).
  2. Professional Misconduct is defined as behavior that violates professional or ethical standards for the profession or discipline for which a student is preparing as adopted or recognized as authoritative by the relevant academic program. The term includes, but is not limited to, misconduct that demonstrates the student’s unfitness for such profession or discipline. “professional misconduct”: (a) negligence; (b) a breach by a Member, Student, Firm, Public Accounting Firm or Professional Corporation of the Act, or the Bylaws or the Regulations; (c) undertaking work the Member, Student, Firm, Public Accounting Firm or Professional Corporation is not competent to perform by virtue of his, her or its training and experience; (d) fraud, theft, forgery, tax evasion, violation of securities laws, or unlawful conduct in the Member’s, Student’s, Firm’s, Public Accounting Firm’s or Professional Corporation’s professional capacity, including any criminal conviction of the above;
  3.  The ethical role of managers is broadened beyond fiduciary responsibility when consideration is given to the multiple stakeholders who constitute the organization being managed and to nature, on which human civilization depends for its survival. Business decisions affect both stakeholders and nature; therefore, a logical conclusion is that those decisions have ethical content inherently and that managerial decisions, behaviors, and actions are therefore inherently ethical in nature. Whenever there are impacts due to a decision, behavior, or action that a leader or manager makes, there are ethical aspects to that decision or situation. While some skeptics claim that business ethics is an oxymoron, the reality is that decisions and actions have consequences, and that reality implies some degree of ethics, high or low. Thus, ethics and the managerial role cannot realistically be teased apart.
  4. Ethical dilemmas, also known as a moral dilemmas, are situations in which there is a choice to be made between two options, neither of which resolves the situation in an ethically acceptable fashion. In such cases, societal and personal ethical guidelines can provide no satisfactory outcome for the chooser. Ethical dilemmas assume that the chooser will abide by societal norms, such as codes of law or religious teachings, in order to make the choice ethically impossible
  1. Straw man approaches to business ethics are raised by business ethics scholars primarily to demonstrate that they offer inappropriate guidelines for ethical decision making in a multinational enterprise – The Friedman Doctrine states that the only social responsibility of business is to increase profits, so long as the company stays within the rules of law. Cultural Relativism believes that ethics are nothing more than the reflection of a culture (‘When in Rome, do as the Romans’) • The Righteous Moralist claims that a multinational’s home-country standards of ethics are the appropriate ones in all countries • The Naïve Immoralist asserts that if a manager sees that firms from other nations are not following ethical norms in a host country then they should not either…any explanation mentioning at least 3 of the above fetches 3.5
  1. Stereotyping is a subject of singular relevance to ethics. Stereotyping is about extrapolating from an individual to a class, as a whole. At least 4 examples with explanation fetches 3.5


7.      Any shenanigans of

Cash Flow

Stretching A/P

Financing A/P

Securitizing A/R

Repurchasing Stock to Offset Dilution..MENTION OF 4 FETCHES 3.4

  1. Normative ethics is about intrinsic value, right and wrong, and/or virtues. The following are claims concerning normative ethics:

It is wrong to kill people just because they make you angry.

We should fight to free slaves when necessary, even when doing so is illegal.

Pain is intrinsically bad—we ought not cause pain without a good reason to do so.

It is reasonable for a person to give charity to those in need, even if no reciprocation should be expected.

Normative ethics is about what actually has overriding importance for determining how we ought to act. Even if you want a million dollars, you ought not kill innocent people in order to get a million dollars in return. Etiquette is often said to be similar to normative ethics, except etiquette is not of overriding importance. Burping is considered to be rude, but it is not that big of a deal.

Descriptive ethics is about what motivates pro-social behavior, how people reason about ethics, what people believe to have overriding importance, and how societies regulate behavior (such as by punishing people for doing certain actions). We know that empathy helps motivate pro-social behavior (such as giving to charity) and we know that our beliefs about what has overriding importance is somewhat based on the culture we live in.

What behaviors are punished in a society tells us something about what the people find to be of overriding importance, and the type of punishment I have in mind is basically just negative consequences. Punishment could even be social pressure, such as being criticized for doing something unethical. For example, Jonathan Haidt has talked about the importance of gossip and reputation for motivating ethical behavior. There are certain predictable ways people reason about ethics (often in unreasonable ways).

  1. Explain the merits and limitations of legal accounting. ANY 4 EACH
  2. ANY 5 SIGN/ADVANTAGES/RELEVEANCE.

SECTION B 15 MARKS…MAXIMUM 13 MARKS ONLY.—EXELLL-13,V.GOOD 12, GOOD 11, OK-10.

  1. Why is ethics important for a Corporate? What are the causes of unethical behavior in workplaces?  7.5+7.5 marks

At least 7 points of importance –  proportionate if less

and 7 points of unethical behavior spaning all functions, at least 3 in each- explained in detail- proportionately less if students has given less points.

  1. Short notes- at least two, 7.5 marks for each.

A)Good business— importance of ethics, ethical hiring,advt,account, finance all points to be addressed.

B)6 test of ethical behavior- mirror, etc…all six explained ONLY WILL FETCH.

C)Ethical hiring and equal opportunity- all concepts to be mentioned.

13.SMALL CASE –EXPORTS- 6 TEST TO BE APPLIED HERE. IF NOT, ONLY GENERAL ANSWER THEN 8 MARKS MAXM……IF ALL TEST –MIRROR ETC COVERED THEN IT WILL FETCH 13 .

14.ENVIRONMENT AND ETHICS- ANTROPROCENTRSIM, NON-ANTHROPROCENTRISM, SPECISIT PREJUDICE, UTILITITRAIN VIEWS, RIGHTS AND JUSTICE VIEW OF ANIMALS. LAST MAN ON PLANET VIEW.

IF ADDRESSED WILL FETCH 13 OTHERWISE PROPOTIONATELY LESS.

14.ETHICAL COMPLIANCES PROGRAMMES- ANY 7 -8 PROGRAMES DESCRIBED WILL FETCH 13 MARKS.

 

SECTION: C CASE STUDY- (5+2+2 FOR FACTS OF CASE, ANALYSIS, CONCLUSION)+(3+4+4- FOR QUESTIONS)

 

 

 

 

 

© Copyright Entrance India - Engineering and Medical Entrance Exams in India | Website Maintained by Firewall Firm - IT Monteur