LOYOLA COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS), CHENNAI – 600 034
|
M.Sc. DEGREE EXAMINATION – STATISTICS
FOURTH SEMESTER – April 2009
ST 4808 – STATISTICAL COMPUTING – III
Date & Time: 25/04/2009 / 9:00 – 12:00 Dept. No. Max. : 100 Marks
Answer any three questions
- a) The data shown here are and R values for 24 samples of size n=5 taken from a process producing bearings. The measurements are made on the inside diameter of the bearing, with only the last three digits recorded.
Sample number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
34.5 | 34.2 | 31.6 | 31.5 | 35.0 | 34.1 | 32.6 | 33.8 | 34.8 | 33.6 | 31.9 | |
R | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 3 |
Sample number | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
38.6 | 35.4 | 34 | 37.1 | 34.9 | 33.5 | 31.7 | 34 | 35.1 | 33.7 | 32.8 | |
R | 9 | 8 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
Sample number | 23 | 24 | |||||||||
33.5 | 34.2 | ||||||||||
R | 3 | 2 |
(i). Sep up and R charts on this process. Does the process seem to be in statistical control? If necessary, revise the trial control limits.
(ii). If specifications on this diameter are 0.50300.0010, find the percentage of nonconforming bearings produced by this process. Assume that diameter is normally distributed.
b). In the semiconductor industry, the production of microcircuits involves many steps. The wafer fabrication process typically builds these microcircuits on silicon wafers and there are many microcircuits per wafer. Each production lot consists of between 16 and 48 wafers. Some processing steps treat each wafer separately, so that the batch size for that step is one wafer. It is usually necessary to estimate several components of variation: within-wafer, between-wafer, between-lot and the total variation. A critical dimension (measured in mm) is of interest to the process engineer. Suppose that five fixed position are used on each wafer (position 1 is the center) and that two consecutive wafers are selected of each batch. The data that results several batches are shown below.
(i) What can you say about over all process capability?
(ii) Can you construct control charts that allow within- wafer variability to be evaluated?
(iii) What control charts would you establish to evaluate variability between wafers? Set
up these charts and use them to draw conclusions about the process.
Lot No. | Wafer No. | Position | |||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
1 | 1 | 2.15 | 2.13 | 2.08 | 2.12 | 2.10 | |||
2 | 2.13 | 2.10 | 2.04 | 2.08 | 2.05 | ||||
2 | 1 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 2.05 | 2.08 | |||
2 | 2.03 | 2.09 | 2.07 | 2.06 | 2.04 | ||||
3 | 1 | 2.13 | 2.12 | 2.10 | 2.11 | 2.08 | |||
2 | 2.03 | 2.08 | 2.03 | 2.09 | 2.07 | ||||
4 | 1 | 2.04 | 2.01 | 2.10 | 2.11 | 2.09 | |||
2 | 2.07 | 2.14 | 2.12 | 2.08 | 2.09 | ||||
5 | 1 | 2.16 | 2.17 | 2.13 | 2.18 | 2.10 | |||
2 | 2.17 | 2.13 | 2.10 | 2.09 | 2.13 | ||||
6 | 1 | 2.04 | 2.06 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.08 | |||
2 | 2.03 | 2.10 | 2.05 | 2.07 | 2.04 | ||||
7 | 1 | 2.04 | 2.02 | 2.01 | 2.00 | 2.05 | |||
2 | 2.06 | 2.04 | 2.03 | 2.08 | 2.10 | ||||
8 | 1 | 2.13 | 2.10 | 2.10 | 2.15 | 2.13 | |||
2 | 2.10 | 2.09 | 2.13 | 2.14 | 2.11 | ||||
9 | 1 | 2.00 | 2.03 | 2.08 | 2.07 | 2.08 | |||
2 | 2.01 | 2.03 | 2.06 | 2.05 | 2.04 | ||||
10 | 1 | 2.04 | 2.08 | 2.09 | 2.10 | 2.01 | |||
2 | 2.06 | 2.04 | 2.07 | 2.04 | 2.01 | ||||
(17 +17)
- a). Bath concentrations are measured hourly in a chemical process. Data (in PPM) for the
last 32 hours are shown below (read down from left).
160 | 186 | 190 | 206 |
158 | 195 | 189 | 210 |
150 | 179 | 185 | 216 |
151 | 184 | 182 | 212 |
153 | 175 | 181 | 211 |
154 | 192 | 180 | 202 |
158 | 186 | 183 | 205 |
162 | 197 | 186 | 197 |
The process target is =175 PPM.
(i). Estimate the process standard deviation.
(ii). Construct a tabular cusum for this process using standardized values of h = 5 and
k = .
b). A product is shipped in lots of size N = 2000. Find a Dodge-Romig single-sampling plan for which the LTPD = 1%, assuming that the process average is 0.25% defective. Draw the OC curve and ATI curve for this plan. What is the AOQL for this sampling plan? (20+14)
3) (a) Analyze the following 32 factorial design (24)
Replicate I Replicate II
a0b0
20 |
a1b0
32 |
a0b2
40 |
a1b1
60 |
a0b1
48 |
a2b0
55 |
a2b1
60 |
a1b2
31 |
a2b2
51 |
a1b1
42 |
a1b2
60 |
a0b1
40 |
a2b0
25 |
a0b0
62 |
a1b0
45 |
a2b2
61 |
a2b1
31 |
a0b2
42 |
(b) Construct BIBD using the following :
V = 7, b =7, r = 3, k = 3, λ=1 (10)
4) (a) Analyze the following 23 factorial experiment in blocks of 4 plots, involving three fertilizers N,
P and K each at two levels. (17)
Replicate I Replicate II
Block 1 | np
88 |
npk
90 |
(1)
115 |
k
75 |
Block 2 | p
101 |
n
111 |
pk
75 |
nk
55 |
Block 3 | (1)
115 |
npk
95 |
nk
90 |
p
80 |
Block 4 | np
125 |
k
95 |
pk
80 |
n
100 |
Replicate III
Block 5 | pk
53 |
nk
76 |
(1)
65 |
np
82 |
Block 6 | n
75 |
npk
100 |
P
55 |
k
92 |
(b) Use the Kuhn-Tucker conditions to solve the following Non-Linear Programming Problem:
Maximize z = 2x1 + x2 -x12
Subject to the constraints:
2x1+ 3x2 ≤ 6,
5x1+ 2x2 ≤ 10
x1, x2 ≥ 0 (17)
5) (a) Use Penalty method to solve the following L.P.P:
Minimize = 9x1 + 10x2
Subject to the constraints:
2x1 + 4x2 ≥ 50,
4x1 + 3x2 ≥ 24,
3x1 + 2x2 ≥ 60
x1, x2 ≥ 0 (17)
(b) Use Beale’s method to solve the following Q.P.P:
Minimize z = 6- 6x1 + 2x12 – 2x1x2 + 2x22
Subject to x1 + x2 ≤ 2
x1, x2 ≥ 0 (17)
Latest Govt Job & Exam Updates: