LOYOLA COLLEGE (AUTONOMOUS), CHENNAI – 600 034
M.Sc. DEGREE EXAMINATION – STATISTICS
|
SECOND SEMESTER – APRIL 2007
ST 2809/ST 2807/ST 2802 – TESTING STATISTICAL HYPOTHESIS
Date & Time: 19/04/2007 / 1:00 – 4:00 Dept. No. Max. : 100 Marks
SECTION-A (10 x 2 = 20)
Answer ALL the questions. Each carries 2 marks.
- Distinguish between randomized and non-randomized tests.
- What are the two types of errors in testing of hypothesis?
- Give an example of a family of distributions, which has MLR property.
- State the necessary condition of Neyman Pearson Fundamental Lemma.
- Use Graphical illustration to differentiate between MPT and UMPT.
- Define the (k+1) parameter exponential family and give an example.
- What do you mean by Unbiasedness?
- When do you say that a test function is similar?
- When do you say that a function is maximal invariant?
- Explain briefly the principles of LRT.
SECTION-B (5 x 8 = 40)
Answer any FIVE questions. Each carries 8 marks.
- If X ≥ 1 is the critical region for testing H0: θ = 1 against H1: θ = 2 on the basis of a single observation
from the population with pdf
f(x ,θ) = θ exp{ – θ x }, 0 < x <∞; 0 otherwise.
Obtain the size and power of the test.
- State and prove MLR theorem of Karlin-Rubin.
- Suppose there exists UMPT of size a for testing a composite H0 against composite H1 then show that it is
unbiased.
- Let X1, X2, …, Xn be i.i.d random variables each with density
f(x, θ) = exp { – (xi-θ)}, θ< x < ∞, -∞<θ<∞
0, elsewhere.
Find the UMPT of size α for testing H0: θ≤ θ0 against H1: θ > θ0.
Also, obtain the cut-off point when α = 0.05, n=15 and θ0 = 5.
- Let X1,X2,…,Xn be iid C(θ, 1). Derive LMPT of size a for testing H0:θ ≤ 0 against H1: θ > 0 and show
that it is biased.
- Show that a function T is invariant under G if and only if T is a function of the maximal invariant.
- Let the p.d.f. of X be f(x) = (2/θ2) (θ-x) ; 0< x < θ ,
0, otherwise
Construct 100(1-α)% confidence interval for θ.
- Let X be a binomial variate with parameters n and p. Derive the likelihood ratio test of level α for testing
H0: p ≤ p0 against H1: p > p0.
SECTION-C (2 x 20 =40)
Answer any TWO questions. Each carries 20 marks.
- a) State and prove the sufficiency part of Neyman- Pearson Generalized theorem. (12)
- b) Show that UMPT of size α does not exist for testing H0: μ= µ0 against H1: μ ≠ µ0
when the sample of size ‘n’ is drawn from N(μ, 1). (8)
- Let X and Y be independent Poisson variates with parameters λ and μ respectively. Derive the
unconditional UMPUT of size a for testing H0: λ ≤ aμ against H1: λ> aμ, where a > 0. (20)
- a) Consider the ( k+1) parameter exponential family. Suppose there exists a function
V =h(u,t) such that V is independent of T when q = q0 and V is increasing in U for every fixed T then
derive the UMPT of size a for testing H0 : q £ q0 against H1 : q > q0. (10)
- b) Why do we require Locally optimal tests? How do you derive it using the
Generalized Neyman-Pearson theorem? (10)
22 a) Let X1, X2,…..Xn be iid N(m,s2). Consider the problem of testing H0: s £ s0 against H1: s > s0.
Derive UMPIT for the above testing problem under the appropriate group of transformations. (12)
- b) Let X1, X2, …, Xn be iid U(0, θ) random variables. Construct (1-α) – level UMA
confidence interval for θ. (8)